This judgment text has undergone conversion so that it is mobile and web-friendly. This may have created formatting or alignment issues. Please refer to the PDF copy for a print-friendly version.
In the High Court of the Republic of Singapore
[1997] SGHC 192
Suit 1265/1995
Between
Teo Teck Guan Teo Teck Guan (as representative of the Estate of Sin Yin Yong appointed under Order of Court dated 31 January 1997) |
… Plaintiff
And
Moulmein Development Pte Ltd |
… Defendant
grounds of decision
This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. |
Teo Teck Guan and Another v Moulmein Development Pte Ltd
[1997] SGHC 192
Suit 1265/1995
Choo Han Teck JC
16 July 1997
Choo Han Teck JC
16 July 1997
1
Judgment:
Judgment:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 animus possidendi
15
16
17
18 animus possidendi would not have been satisfied.
19 16. In the Lee Martin
20
21
22
23
24 - Sgd -
25 Choo Han Teck
26 Judicial Commissioner
27 Singapore, 16 July 1997.
Choo Han Teck JC |
Khoo Boo Jin and Tan Hwee Leng [Wee Swee Teow & Co] for the plaintiffs
Davinder Singh and Harpreet S Nehal [Drew & Napier] for the defendants
Davinder Singh and Harpreet S Nehal [Drew & Napier] for the defendants
This judgment text has undergone conversion so that it is mobile and web-friendly. This may have created formatting or alignment issues. Please refer to the PDF copy for a print-friendly version.
Version No 1: 11 Sep 2026 (01:05 hrs)