This judgment text has undergone conversion so that it is mobile and web-friendly. This may have created formatting or alignment issues. Please refer to the PDF copy for a print-friendly version.
In the High Court of the Republic of Singapore
[1997] SGHC 344
Suit No 1214/95
Between
Industrial Valve Services Pte Ltd |
… Plaintiff
And
Crosby Valve Pte Ltd |
… Defendant
And
Christopher Philip Sperring |
… Third Party
grounds of decision
This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. |
Industrial Valve Services Pte Ltd v Crosby Valve Pte Ltd (Christopher Philip Sperring, Third Party)
[1997] SGHC 344
Suit No 1214/95
Chao Hick Tin J
27 December 1997
Chao Hick Tin J
27 December 1997
1
Judgment:
Judgment:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 Title to assets
19 Halsbury Laws of England Vol 45 (4th Edition) para 1433.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34 Letter of 7th March 1994
35
36
37 (2) Items fabricated by IVS.
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52 Letter dated 15 April 1994
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66 certain
67
68
69 1.2
70
71 receiver, Price Waterhouse.
72
73 Note (b)
74 Crosby requires that carried out by Crosby personnel of all assets listed
75 5.2
76 assets other than those reviewed herein." (Emphasis added).
77
78
79
80
81
82 Hayward/McIntosh.
83
84
85
86
87 E.U.V(S$) F.S.V(S$)
88
89
90
91
92
93
94 the above) 4,250 2,100"
95
96
97 Estoppel/Acquiescence
98
99
100
101
102
103 Damages
104
105
106
107
108 Third party proceedings
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119 CHAO HICK TIN
120 JUDGE
121 SINGAPORE
122 DATE: 27TH DECEMBER 1997
123 Counsel: Mr S. Sreenivasan for
plaintiffs
plaintiffs
124 Ms Cheyrl Tan for defendants
125 Firms: M/s Derrick Ravi &
Partners
Partners
126 M/s Drew & Napier
Chao Hick Tin J |
S Sreenivasan (Derrick Ravi & Partners) for the plaintiffs
Cheyrl Tan (Drew & Napier) for the defendants
Cheyrl Tan (Drew & Napier) for the defendants
This judgment text has undergone conversion so that it is mobile and web-friendly. This may have created formatting or alignment issues. Please refer to the PDF copy for a print-friendly version.
Version No 1: 11 Sep 2026 (01:05 hrs)